首页> 外文OA文献 >Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams
【2h】

Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams

机译:我们在同一页面上吗?跨职能团队的知识界限和交互式内存系统开发

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the key challenges that organizations face when trying to integrate knowledge across different functions is the need to overcome knowledge boundaries between team members. In cross-functional teams, these boundaries, associated with different knowledge backgrounds of people from various disciplines, create communication problems, necessitating team members to engage in complex cognitive processes when integrating knowledge toward a joint outcome. This research investigates the impact of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge boundaries on a team’s ability to develop a transactive memory system (TMS)—a collective memory system for knowledge coordination in groups. Results from our survey show that syntactic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries negatively affect TMS development. These findings extend TMS theory beyond the information-processing view, which treats knowledge as an object that can be stored and retrieved, to the interpretive and practice-based views of knowledge, which recognize that knowledge (in particular specialized knowledge) is localized, situated, and embedded in practice.
机译:组织尝试跨不同职能集成知识时面临的主要挑战之一是需要克服团队成员之间的知识界限。在跨职能团队中,这些界限与来自不同学科的人们的不同知识背景相关联,会造成沟通问题,使团队成员在将知识整合为共同成果时需要参与复杂的认知过程。这项研究调查了句法,语义和务实知识边界对团队开发事务性记忆系统(TMS)的能力的影响,该系统是用于集体知识协调的集体记忆系统。我们的调查结果表明,句法和实用知识边界会对TMS的发展产生负面影响。这些发现将TMS理论扩展到了信息处理视图之外,信息处理视图将知识视为可以存储和检索的对象,而知识的解释性和基于实践的视图则认识到知识(特别是专门知识)是本地化的,位于,并嵌入到实践中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号